[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: Bug#47185: acknowledged by developer ("View source" in fixed fonts)
From:       Martin Koller <m.koller () surfeu ! at>
Date:       2002-08-30 21:25:01
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 30 August 2002 20:59, Ingo Klöcker wrote:

> Huh? We already have configurable fonts for much less important things.
> I mean who really uses different fonts for the folder list and the
> message (header) list? Why do we not simply use the standard KDE font
> like every other program?
>
> Making it possible for the user to choose a non-proportional font for
> the source code view makes IMO much more sense than a configurable
> folder list font. Of course we already have a configurable Fixed Width
> Font. So we could simply add a checkbox
> [ ] Use Fixed Width Font in Message Source Window
>
> But where should we put this checkbox? It would be much easier to simply
> add another configurable font to our already existant font
> configuration.

Why not simply using the font "Message Body", which can be already defined?

-- 
Best Regards/Schöne Grüße

Martin

_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]