[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: kdenetwork/kmail
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2002-04-30 21:42:29
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 30 April 2002 19:17, Carsten Burghardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 April 2002 14:22, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > Last but not least, I'd like to note that I also hate the popup
> > because it interrupts my work flow. Therefore I came up with the
> > best solution _I_ could think of.
>
> So we've the "classic" way, that obviously some people still prefer.
> And we've a different way, that would (perhaps!) be better for people
> that aren't experienced (I think that most of the "newbies" have used
> Microsoft products before and are therefore used to Outlook {Express}
> and now that behaviour but that's a different point).
> Why don't we implement both ways?

Because of over-configurability. For me it would be o.k. to make this 
configurable by editting kmailrc without a corresponding GUI option. 
This would enable experienced users to turn the popup off while on the 
same time the config dialog wouldn't be cluttered with too many 
options.
Are we allowed to use config options which can't be changed from the 
GUI?

Regards,
Ingo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8zw/GGnR+RTDgudgRAoalAKCuAVkay1u2XjdF7lL/hO6piWOs2gCeNBBl
d83KjU9cxWs7cAp9RBbqCqg=
=EAYQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]