[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: kdenetwork/kmail
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2002-04-30 21:35:56
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 30 April 2002 19:10, Carsten Burghardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 April 2002 12:42, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > I vote for (b), since it's non-intrusive and respects the style
> > guide. The latter is a pretty strong argument, mind, even if KMail
> > wasn't particularly good at following it in the past...
>
> The style guide for file-operations? That's not the same, because
> kmail is _not_ konqueror.

And apples are _no_ pears. Is that a valid reason? I don't think so.

In reality there is no logical difference between dnd of files in order 
to move/copy them to another folder and dnd of email messages in order 
to move/copy them to another folder. (And if you use maildir folders it 
even physically the same.)

Therefore the behaviour has to be the same.

Regards,
Ingo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8zw4/GnR+RTDgudgRAi1xAJ9KAdFkrm2KApueKdMjL2BjIYKLnQCg0qKk
mHPoY6VfbkJMlJboOsQbOTY=
=YZSU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
KMail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]