[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: $%^#%&^@%&@%
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-15?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2002-02-05 10:17:35
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rob Walker wrote:
> But then I am of the feeling that kmail should be written as follows:
> 
> 1.  Write a back end with a bunch of libraries.
> 2.  Write front-ends as necessary.
> a.  vi-mode
> b.  emacs mode
> (These last two are for us complete _freaks_)
> c.  iMail mode
> (just to anger the lawyers at Apple.  :-)
> d.  Eudora mode
> (a sensible default?)

What about KMail mode? If you don't like it please do me a favor and 
use another mail client.

Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8X7E/qUQWN/hplRsRAtsyAKC073fpWDZYgoP1O0J+iqJHM+XXywCghWNx
bQ2/VyjzEmWUzaucabOK614=
=abYo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]