[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: $%^#%&^@%&@%
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2002-02-02 11:09:14
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 02 February 2002 04:01, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> Ok, who's idea was it to remove filter rules when the folder doesn't
> exist?

Obviously not yours. ;-)
So what should we do with broken filters? Just keep them and always bail 
out with an error message if the rule matches but the target folder 
doesn't exist? Or ask the user on every KMail start for every broken 
filter if it should be deleted?

> I just tested KMail with 4 folders instead of my usual 30 and
> appearantly that was reason to throw away my filter settings for the
> other 26. Thank you very much...

Sorry about that. Are you sure that the filters are really lost? I guess 
most of them are still in the kmailrc. Only the number of filters has 
been reduced and the first few broken filters have been overwritten by 
filters which are still valid.

Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8W8jaGnR+RTDgudgRAmQsAJ0eOxMFbVm+BGeeyPWJkKFMueJDOACfTSH3
1cI0uEo4Su2OnNnxkrPfVOg=
=9uc1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]