From kmail-devel Sat Feb 02 11:09:14 2002 From: Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2002 11:09:14 +0000 To: kmail-devel Subject: Re: $%^#%&^@%&@% X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kmail-devel&m=101264847300478 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 02 February 2002 04:01, Waldo Bastian wrote: > Ok, who's idea was it to remove filter rules when the folder doesn't > exist? Obviously not yours. ;-) So what should we do with broken filters? Just keep them and always bail=20 out with an error message if the rule matches but the target folder=20 doesn't exist? Or ask the user on every KMail start for every broken=20 filter if it should be deleted? > I just tested KMail with 4 folders instead of my usual 30 and > appearantly that was reason to throw away my filter settings for the > other 26. Thank you very much... Sorry about that. Are you sure that the filters are really lost? I guess=20 most of them are still in the kmailrc. Only the number of filters has=20 been reduced and the first few broken filters have been overwritten by=20 filters which are still valid. Regards, Ingo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8W8jaGnR+RTDgudgRAmQsAJ0eOxMFbVm+BGeeyPWJkKFMueJDOACfTSH3 1cI0uEo4Su2OnNnxkrPfVOg=3D =3D9uc1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ kmail Developers mailing list kmail@mail.kde.org http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail