[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kmail-devel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH]: SLightly change a few strings
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <ingo.kloecker () epost ! de>
Date:       2001-11-29 23:22:48
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 30 November 2001 01:52, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Thursday 29 November 2001 23:10, Chris Howells wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > This patch is fairly self explanatory -- I think it just makes the
> > meaning of the few messages slightly clearer.
>
> <snip>
>
> Currently we show the "good signature" color for sigs from untrusted
> keys, too. Ingo, we should use the "can't be checked" color with
> somthing like "The signature is valid, but not trusted to be
> authentic" (or something like that - I have problems coming up with a
> message that doesn't duplicate the UID...)

I'm currently working on trust checking. For GnuPG it should basically 
work already. Now I have to do the same for PGP2 (it's not possible to 
get the trust info for a single key, argh..), PGP5 and PGP6 and it's 
different for all three versions. :-(

BTW, I wanted to say something like the following:
"The signature is valid, but the key is untrusted."
and
"The signature is valid and the key is marginally/fully/ultimately 
trusted." (Is a comma necessary before the "and"?)

> Green would then be for "valid and trusted".
> Yellow for "valid but untrusted" and
>            "can't be checked dur to missing key".
> Red for "is invalid".

I agree.

> What do you think? Can a native speaker without gnupg terminology
> background please stand up and be our guinea-pig? ;-)

Marc? Can I commit my patch this weekend? It should really be commited 
before the beta1 packages are made.

Regards,
Ingo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8BsNIGnR+RTDgudgRAvLkAKCJKI2Xlvsep8muK+x3GPWmSpqitACgqKlW
WjpCS7TygCm8ywA/YipKSsU=
=dijP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
kmail Developers mailing list
kmail@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]