[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: khtml
From:       Lars Knoll <lars () trolltech ! com>
Date:       2000-08-16 21:40:29
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, you wrote:
> > That would require quite some hacks and I would not want to do something
> > like that before KDE-2
>
> Oh shit. I keep forgetting that the whole history is saved as a stream.
> That sort of sucks. Otherwise it would be a matter of clearing the
> stringlist and you would be done. This stringlist wouldn't need to be saved
> then either.
>
> Maybe instead of storing the actual document contents in the stream it
> would be better to store an cache-id in the stream and have a seperate
> object take care of looking up cache-ids and returning content.
>
> That would allow to store the cached information in other places than
> memory as well and it would allow to expire cache-entries independent from
> the history.

That sounds much better to me. I'd really prefer, if we do _not_ save the 
html in memory, and especially not in the history.

Lars

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]