[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: Gecko
From:       Frédéric_LEUBA <frederic.leuba () free ! fr>
Date:       2000-04-06 10:17:34
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks for the answer,

Well, you're probably right, rendering seems to be faster than Mozilla.
The fact is that Gecko would provide now a very complete support for all
standards that are not yet available in Konq. We will see what KDE guys
decide. Till now they've made the right choice.

F. LEUBA

----- Original Message -----
From: "mosfet" <mosfet@mandrakesoft.com>
To: <kfm-devel@master.kde.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: Gecko


> Hrm, I'm just a user when it comes to Konq but a) layout appears already
> done and b) without all the debug output seems as though it would render
> faster than Mozilla. Why would one want to switch to something else when
> KDE's seems both complete and faster?
>
> Don't believe the hype ;-)
>
> > Frédéric LEUBA wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think you all know about Gecko.
> > My question is simple: Is it planned to use Gecko engine into Kde and
> > more specially Konquetor ?
> > Gecko is opensource, it supports all latest standards from the W3C, it
> > is pretty fast and light and very modular.
> > Wouldn't it be a great idea to integrate it into the KDE core, it is
> > waste of time to reinvent the wheel.
> >
> > F. LEUBA
>
> --
> Daniel M. Duley - Unix developer & sys admin.
> http://www.mosfet.org - The place for KDE development news.
> mosfet@mandrakesoft.com
> mosfet@kde.org
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]