[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kfm-devel
Subject: Re: tabbed browsing bugs
From: Doug Hanley <hanleyman () adelphia ! net>
Date: 2002-04-22 22:59:48
[Download RAW message or body]
On Monday 22 April 2002 03:36 am, David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 21 April 2002 00:39, Doug Hanley wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 April 2002 03:45 am, David Faure wrote:
> > > On Saturday 20 April 2002 00:00, Doug Hanley wrote:
> > > > Also, when doing view-follows-view, only honor views that are visible
> > > > (literally using view->isVisible() to test).
> > >
> > > Possibly (I don't remember a isVisible() method, must be new ;)
> >
> > well, its view->frame()->isVisible() to be precise
> >
> > BTW, David, do you think I should make new profiles that explicitly
> > support tabs, such as webbrowsing-tabs and filemanagement-tabs?
>
> I don't see why some profiles should support tabs and some shouldn't.
> IIRC you implemented tabs in a way that requires them to be mentionned
> in the profile, but from a user point of view, why should I be unable to
> use tabs in some cases? Some profiles might not come up with tabs
> initially, but I might want to create one while using it....
Hmm.. I just thought of something. I think it might be best to keep the idea
that George Staikos had (use the active view if there is no docContainer),
and improve it a little. We could put in code that makes the highest level
view or container that is not passive the docContainer upon loading a
profile.
Yeah, I think I'll try it... sorry about the disturbance.
-- Doug Hanley
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic