[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: Bug fixing co-ordination.
From:       Vadim Plessky <lucy-ples () mtu-net ! ru>
Date:       2001-10-15 13:26:43
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 15 October 2001 10:44, Michael Bedy wrote:
|   On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, David Faure wrote:
|   > On Lundi 15 Octobre 2001 11:42, Michael Bedy wrote:
|   > >   Well, the reason I did it was a website I use was broken without
|   > > it. I have seen MANY websites that use it to validate field inputs
|   > > before sending them off to the server. As far as making it manditory,
|   > > I'm not sure I have an opinion there. I will read that bug and see if
|   > > one develops.
|   >
|   > Actually............ Martijn may be right. Can you first look at Qt3's
|   > qregexp ? It might have all we need, and then we can get rid of the
|   > libpcre dependency.
|
|      Well, I can look deeper later, but one thing I notice right off is
| that QRegEx does not support multi-line :-) It seems to have a couple other
| differences too. On initial look, I think pcre is closer to the js spec.
| But, I might be wrong about that - I would need to look in more detail.
| (Which I guess I can do.)

may be, in this case it makes sense to report problem to TrollTech 
(<qt-bugs@trolltech.com>) and get support for multi-line RegExp in QT3?
QT3 is in Beta, so it's right time to patch it.

|
|       - Mike

-- 

Vadim Plessky
http://kde2.newmail.ru  (English)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
http://kde2.newmail.ru/kde_themes.html
KDE mini-Themes
http://kde2.newmail.ru/themes/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]