[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kfm-devel
Subject:    Re: OT: Re: Bug fixing co-ordination.
From:       Michael Bedy <mjbedy () mediaone ! net>
Date:       2001-10-15 10:51:22
[Download RAW message or body]


   Close, but I think pcre is closer...

   I will investigate further.

     - Mike


On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Martijn Klingens wrote:

> On Monday 15 October 2001 11:05, David Faure wrote:
> > Since I remember that you helped with the regexp support, I have two
> > questions for you:
> > * someone suggests that libpcre should be made mandatory, to save people
> > from buggy websites due to bad regexp support. See #30681 for the
> > discussion. I am personnally fine with the current solution though (people
> > who compile from source see the message at the end of configure, and others
> > rely on the packagers).
>
> Forgive my ignorance, but I thought the Qt3 Regexps are perl compatible so
> there is no longer a need for libpcre?
>
> Martijn
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]