[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdepim-users
Subject:    Re: [kdepim-users] dial up internet access with Kmail and Konqueror
From:       PaulFransen <send.me () xs4all ! nl>
Date:       2007-01-28 12:31:54
Message-ID: 200701281331.55393.send.me () xs4all ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Kitts,

yes that is correct. However there is a slight difference as I explained in my 
answer to Will Stephenson:
It makes no difference whether I am online by dialup connection or 
not; in both cases KMail reports the current system time followed by: 
"Transmission complete. No new messages". When KMail does detect that the 
computer is online (other connection than dialup) then it mentions the 
account name it has been checking: "Transmission for account [account name] 
complete. No new messages"

384 kb/sec is pretty fast. It's accomplished trough the third generation 
mobile networks that are being rolled out in my country. The HSDPA protocol 
extension theoretically even allows for downstream speeds up to 10.8 Mb/sec. 
See the interesing article by Klaas van Gend on this subject: 
http://umtsmon.sourceforge.net/docs/NLUUG20060914.umts.paper.pdf

Regards, Paul.




On Saturday 20 January 2007 10:02, kitts wrote:
> On Saturday 20 January 2007 03:01 IST, PaulFransen wrote:
> > Thanks for your suggestion. One of the dial up connections is a UMTS
> > connection with at least 384 kb/sec.
>
> That's pretty fast for "dial-up"! :-D
>
> > It doesn't look like a time out. Kmail is not trying to connect to a pop
> > server at all and immediately displays "Transmission complete. No new
> > messages" preceded by the actual system time.
>
> OK, so you mean that it does not throw you an error, but appears to have
> succeeded while it really did not?
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]