[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kdepim-users
Subject:    Re: [kdepim-users] KMail and SA - Filters
From:       Anne Wilson <cannewilson () tiscali ! co ! uk>
Date:       2006-04-23 9:55:27
Message-ID: 200604231055.27298.cannewilson () tiscali ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Sunday 23 April 2006 09:41, David Jarvie wrote:
> On Sunday 23 April 2006 01:59, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 April 2006 08:42, Spiro A. wrote:
> > > 2) When I get email that is not catched by SA, is it a good idea to
> > > train from time to time the content of this filter?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > If so, is it the
> > > same if I would from konsole run "sa-learn --mbox --spam
> > > /home/Mail/Spam or can I just select all Spam emails and hit the
> > > "Filter Classify as Spam" button from KMail?
> >
> > There should be no difference.
>
> There is a difference. As you stated in your earlier email today, hitting
> the button runs 'sa-learn -L --spam --no-rebuild --single', which requires
> a subsequent 'sa-learn --sync' to make spamassassin actually use what you
> have taught it.

I have changed the setting for the filter 'Classify as Spam' to 

sa-learn -L --spam --sync

This is said to be slower, but if you are not needing it to take huge amounts 
at a time - mine takes a few at a time as they come in - the hit is not 
great.  The result is a huge improvement in efficiency.  It seems slower to 
learn than PopFile was, but there's no doubt that it is learning.  Where it 
was catching less than 50%, it's now catching more than 90%.

Anne

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
kdepim-users@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]