[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-usability
Subject: Re: [KDE Usability] Review Request: Improve contact list group header
From: "Martin Klapetek" <martin.klapetek () gmail ! com>
Date: 2013-01-04 10:37:41
Message-ID: 20130104103741.29640.73939 () vidsolbach ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
> On Nov. 20, 2012, 1:12 p.m., Heiko Tietze wrote:
> > I dislike the idea to apply grouping by an icon or symbol, because the =
items couldn't be easily considered as in- or out-group. If you run a pictu=
re search for "accordion widget" you will find most widgets with +/- soluti=
ons (as Bj=C3=B6rn Balazs recommends), some with triangle up/down and a few=
with down/left (pinned at left side). I guess the right side is preserved =
for properties and therefore seldom used for such "high frequency functions=
".
> > Normal treeview have indents, as Lasath Fernando recommends. Addionally=
you may add space, bevel, splitter or the like between groups (was it the =
"tiny line"?). And last but not least group headers should be designed diff=
erent to normal entries beacause they haven't same functionality.
"I dislike the idea to apply grouping by an icon or symbol, because the ite=
ms couldn't be easily considered as in- or out-group. If you run a picture =
search for "accordion widget" you will find most widgets with +/- solutions=
(as Bj=C3=B6rn Balazs recommends), some with triangle up/down and a few wi=
th down/left (pinned at left side)."
We had the triangle thingy before, I just moved it to the right. I'll try s=
wapping it with the group icon back then.
"Normal treeview have indents, as Lasath Fernando recommends."
We don't have any indent right now and it works and to be honest, I don't w=
ant to add the indent now as they are used as an visual aid in otherwise ho=
mogeneous (multilevel) lists (like folders tree in Dolphin). If we will alw=
ays have only one level deep items and IF the parent items are distinctive =
enough, I believe the indents are unnecessary.
"Addionally you may add space, bevel, splitter or the like between groups (=
was it the "tiny line"?). And last but not least group headers should be de=
signed different to normal entries beacause they haven't same functionality=
."
They do have different design (which itself is the splitter), albeit it doe=
s look closer to the contact entries. I think it's still distinctive enough=
, but I'll play around a bit more.
- Martin
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106763/#review22260
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Nov. 20, 2012, 10:40 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> =
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106763/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> =
> (Updated Nov. 20, 2012, 10:40 a.m.)
> =
> =
> Review request for Telepathy and KDE Usability.
> =
> =
> Description
> -------
> =
> I made several improvements to the group header in contact list:
> =
> 1) Moved the expand sign to the right
> 2) Removed the tiny line
> 3) Made the account/group icon slightly bigger (has the same size as the=
avatar in normal mode; might need adjusting)
> 4) Aligned both the icon and the font with the contacts
> 5) Used background color from palette disabled:highlight and lighter by =
factor of 10
> =
> This is more a visual review request than a code, I tried with several de=
fault KDE color schemes and I think it looks good in all of them, see the s=
creenshot below. Let me know what you think (and if possible try using the =
patch for a while yourself and see how it fits).
> =
> =
> Diffs
> -----
> =
> abstract-contact-delegate.cpp f5f2a05 =
> =
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106763/diff/
> =
> =
> Testing
> -------
> =
> =
> Screenshots
> -----------
> =
> New group header
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106763/s/757/
> =
> =
> Thanks,
> =
> Martin Klapetek
> =
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<html>
<body>
<div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
<table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="8" style="border: 1px #c9c399 solid;">
<tr>
<td>
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
<a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106763/">http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106763/</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<p style="margin-top: 0;">On November 20th, 2012, 1:12 p.m., <b>Heiko Tietze</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; \
white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">I dislike the idea to apply grouping by an \
icon or symbol, because the items couldn't be easily considered as in- or out-group. If you \
run a picture search for "accordion widget" you will find most widgets with +/- \
solutions (as Björn Balazs recommends), some with triangle up/down and a few with down/left \
(pinned at left side). I guess the right side is preserved for properties and therefore seldom \
used for such "high frequency functions". Normal treeview have indents, as Lasath \
Fernando recommends. Addionally you may add space, bevel, splitter or the like between groups \
(was it the "tiny line"?). And last but not least group headers should be designed \
different to normal entries beacause they haven't same functionality. </pre> </blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; \
white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">"I dislike the idea to apply grouping by \
an icon or symbol, because the items couldn't be easily considered as in- or out-group. If \
you run a picture search for "accordion widget" you will find most widgets with +/- \
solutions (as Björn Balazs recommends), some with triangle up/down and a few with down/left \
(pinned at left side)."
We had the triangle thingy before, I just moved it to the right. I'll try swapping it with \
the group icon back then.
"Normal treeview have indents, as Lasath Fernando recommends."
We don't have any indent right now and it works and to be honest, I don't want to add \
the indent now as they are used as an visual aid in otherwise homogeneous (multilevel) lists \
(like folders tree in Dolphin). If we will always have only one level deep items and IF the \
parent items are distinctive enough, I believe the indents are unnecessary.
"Addionally you may add space, bevel, splitter or the like between groups (was it the \
"tiny line"?). And last but not least group headers should be designed different to \
normal entries beacause they haven't same functionality."
They do have different design (which itself is the splitter), albeit it does look closer to the \
contact entries. I think it's still distinctive enough, but I'll play around a bit \
more.</pre> <br />
<p>- Martin</p>
<br />
<p>On November 20th, 2012, 10:40 a.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:</p>
<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" style="background-image: \
url('http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/rb/images/review_request_box_top_bg.png'); \
background-position: left top; background-repeat: repeat-x; border: 1px black solid;"> <tr>
<td>
<div>Review request for Telepathy and KDE Usability.</div>
<div>By Martin Klapetek.</div>
<p style="color: grey;"><i>Updated Nov. 20, 2012, 10:40 a.m.</i></p>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px \
solid #b8b5a0"> <tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; \
white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">I made several \
improvements to the group header in contact list:
1) Moved the expand sign to the right
2) Removed the tiny line
3) Made the account/group icon slightly bigger (has the same size as the avatar in normal \
mode; might need adjusting) 4) Aligned both the icon and the font with the contacts
5) Used background color from palette disabled:highlight and lighter by factor of 10
This is more a visual review request than a code, I tried with several default KDE color \
schemes and I think it looks good in all of them, see the screenshot below. Let me know what \
you think (and if possible try using the patch for a while yourself and see how it fits).</pre> \
</td> </tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> </h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">
<li>abstract-contact-delegate.cpp <span style="color: grey">(f5f2a05)</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106763/diff/" style="margin-left: 3em;">View \
Diff</a></p>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Screenshots </h1>
<div>
<a href="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106763/s/757/"><img \
src="http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/images/2012/10/08/cl_new_header_composed_400x100.png" \
style="border: 1px black solid;" alt="New group header" /></a>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic