[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: [KDE Usability] Users cannot find where to "safely remove" USB
From:       Anne Wilson <cannewilson () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2010-04-06 14:59:34
Message-ID: 201004061559.35017.cannewilson () googlemail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tuesday 06 April 2010 14:28:29 yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 April 2010 08:52:44 yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
> >> Yes, on this I agree, it would be better if the eject icon be always
> >> visible and possibly bigger
> > 
> > Although I agree. I'd go one further.  I'd have a hair-line divider
> > between the device description and the eject button, hinting that there
> > is actually a separate function for the eject, and it's not part of the
> > description, if you see what I mean. :-)  I don't actually see what
> > dimming it does achieve.
> 
> good idea, something like the attached??  or a separate button may be
> better, but I'm not able to mockup:-)
> 
Yes, that's the sort of thing I was thinking of.

> > In 4.4.1 there is the addition of a plug icon when the device is
> > umounted, which gives the oft-requested funcionality of mounting without
> > opening dolphin.  However, that is a less commonly recognsed symbol.  I
> > feel that by adding the simple dividingline, so that people can see that
> > one icon replaces the other, it would be more obviously a toggle.
> > 
Anne

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]