[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: Revamping Konqueror
From:       "Yanis Kekatos" <kekatos () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-10-02 15:13:33
Message-ID: dea3c3190610020813v67631696y810f62c1861fa03a () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Charles,
I guess you're new here.
The notion of your 'konqueror revamp proposal' is the same with a
thread a started half a year ago.
check the thread:   The importance of the default configuration /
Study Case: Kopete (
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-usability&m=114221847415088&w=2 )
Very interesting is the thread that Aaron started after the buzz:
bikeshedding by a list veteran (
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-usability&m=114230856326324&w=2 )

After these conversation I (others here too) am(are) very reluctant to
put some effort to in order to improve the KDE's usability.
To put in another way: 98% of people in kde-usability are not KDE
developers and doesn't have any other connection with KDE. So they can
talk for years here, but no issues are addressed in KDE.
welcome to the reality

On 10/1/06, Charles A. Landemaine <landemaine@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> I created a "Feature request" with a proposal to revamp Konqueror.
> Please have a look at this URL and give us your opinion, what you
> like, what you don't like: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134932
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Charles A. Landemaine.
> _______________________________________________
> kde-usability mailing list
> kde-usability@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
>
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]