[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: Proposal for re-organizing konqueror's config dialogs
From:       Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <gustavo () gsbarbieri ! sytes ! net>
Date:       2004-09-25 2:58:00
Message-ID: 200409242358.00951.gustavo () gsbarbieri ! sytes ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Em Qui 23 Set 2004 13:53, Aaron Seigo escreveu:
> On September 23, 2004 10:37, Sébastien Laoût [temporar] wrote:
> > I would prefer a flatter thing, since humans are not so good at browsing
> > a tree (see KControl) and the flat config only add one item to the File
> > Management section (+2-1=+1) :
>
> not only that, but this structure will be echoed in KControl.. keep that in
> mind, as this will make kcontrol have that much deeper of a hierarchy.

Why not keep konq config just in konq? Why do we have to put it in kcontrol?

I see a trend to put app config in kcontrol and I don't see any reason for it. 
IMHO KControl should be responsible for system settings, maybe apps that 
don't have their own appwindow, like some kde-daemons.

I know konq is a special kde component, but I disagree with it in kcontrol.

-- 
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
---------------------------------------
Engenharia de Computacao 2001 - UNICAMP
GPSL - Grupo Pro Software Livre
Cell..: +55 (19) 9165 8010
Jabber: gsbarbieri@jabber.org
  ICQ#: 17249123
   GPG: 0xB640E1A2 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]