[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: Panel Arrangement KCM
From:       Aaron Seigo <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-02-11 19:57:32
Message-ID: 200402111257.32910.aseigo () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On February 11, 2004 12:53, William Leese wrote:
> While I'm looking I might as well do some nitpicking:

=)

> - The title "Menus" could be simply named "K Menu" to make it more
> apparent we're talking about a specific menu. Note that while the tab
> has options for the quick menus, these are part of K Menu,

while by default they appear in the k menu, they can also be used separately. 

> - Any reason to keep taskbar as a seperate KCM? I don't want to crowd
> the Panel menu.. but if K Menu is considered part of the panel KCM, then
> surely the taskbar is too.

separate code base, history and fear of tabs ;-) there's really no reason 
other than not wanting to clutter up the panel area with it... 5 tabs is too 
much... 4 is borderline =/

this will really only matter in kcontrol since from kicker they will be all 
separated. 

i wouldn't be too adverse to a grouping of the Menus and Taskbar tabs into a 
kcm in kcontrol if we could come up with a good name for it ... i'm tempted 
to say "drop taskbar config from kcontrol altogether" but i'm not sure that 
would fly ...

- -- 
Aaron J. Seigo
while (!horse()); cart();
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAKoks1rcusafx20MRAoraAJ9ewqgGSpDDC8Pd7oxVWxWRM2YwTgCfb8Qe
LQ9YF9HFjP6pyjAM+JrpWTI=
=6uYY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]