[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-usability
Subject:    Re: Ark description: 'Zip' vs 'Compression' vs 'Archiver'
From:       Sander Devrieze <s.devrieze () pandora ! be>
Date:       2003-08-21 20:40:10
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op donderdag 21 augustus 2003 22:32, schreef Gordon Tyler:
> William Leese wrote:
> > The problem is that ark does both. Because there is limited space to
> > describe the application you have to prioritize either the archiving
> > aspect or the compression ascept. Unless we can agree that we can use
> > 'File Compressor/Archiver'? I don't like this approach, because it'll
> > lead to lengthly descriptions.
>
> My personal opinion is that people who are looking for a tool like Ark
> are looking for something that compresses their files. And I don't think
> most people would distinguish between being able to compress a single
> file and archive multiple files into a single file, and I think they
> would assume that a file compressor could compress multiple files into
> one file.
>
> Therefore, I suggest "File Compressor" is better.

I agree.

- -- 
Mvg, Sander Devrieze.

Jabber ID : sander@amessage.de ( www.jabber.org )
Public Key: www.keyserver.net  (   0x73470923   )
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/RUnlK+G8aHNHCSMRAv1HAJ4kS475lOAoeISNuckuYsOpIlIZJQCfeYqT
RXi37aj0gbdjFY+E0VW6Xco=
=bnyG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]