[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-sdk-devel
Subject:    Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Migration of KDESDK to git
From:       Sebastian_Dörner <sebastian () sebastian-doerner ! de>
Date:       2012-05-29 23:15:06
Message-ID: CA+_kBjBR-1-km+UJ5JUgab2JLtpvN3m2FaUxFk33kS6RanhR1Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I think Nicolas already pointed out the kinstance-redesign work
branch, which does not show up the standard conversion. And there seem
to be more of them:

http://stuff.povaddict.com.ar/kde-svn-search.php?substring=kcachegrind&hidetrinity=yes&hidei18n=yes

These branches seem to affect larger parts of kdesdk though, so maybe
we should add something to the common rules.

On 29 May 2012 21:37, Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 29.05.2012 01:10, schrieb Sebastian Dörner:
>
>> I've had a look at the rules and they do not go into many specifics of
>> kdesdk, they are mostly stubs. They do take into account the move from
>> /trunk to /trunk/KDE, but that is basically all.
>
>
> It looks like the stub rules are fine for kcachegrind, as
> - kcachegrind always was in kdesdk, any moves were done only in
> its subdirectory,
> - there were no SVN branches apart from the KDE releases.
> At least, the git repo I get from a test conversion on dewey.kde.org
> looks fine...
>
> I updated the wiki accordingly.
>
> Thanks,
> Josef
> _______________________________________________
> kde-sdk-devel mailing list
> kde-sdk-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-sdk-devel
_______________________________________________
kde-sdk-devel mailing list
kde-sdk-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-sdk-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]