From kde-sdk-devel  Tue May 29 23:15:06 2012
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_D=F6rner?= <sebastian () sebastian-doerner ! de>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 23:15:06 +0000
To: kde-sdk-devel
Subject: Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Migration of KDESDK to git
Message-Id: <CA+_kBjBR-1-km+UJ5JUgab2JLtpvN3m2FaUxFk33kS6RanhR1Q () mail ! gmail ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-sdk-devel&m=133833348615657

I think Nicolas already pointed out the kinstance-redesign work
branch, which does not show up the standard conversion. And there seem
to be more of them:

http://stuff.povaddict.com.ar/kde-svn-search.php?substring=3Dkcachegrind&hi=
detrinity=3Dyes&hidei18n=3Dyes

These branches seem to affect larger parts of kdesdk though, so maybe
we should add something to the common rules.

On 29 May 2012 21:37, Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 29.05.2012 01:10, schrieb Sebastian D=F6rner:
>
>> I've had a look at the rules and they do not go into many specifics of
>> kdesdk, they are mostly stubs. They do take into account the move from
>> /trunk to /trunk/KDE, but that is basically all.
>
>
> It looks like the stub rules are fine for kcachegrind, as
> - kcachegrind always was in kdesdk, any moves were done only in
> its subdirectory,
> - there were no SVN branches apart from the KDE releases.
> At least, the git repo I get from a test conversion on dewey.kde.org
> looks fine...
>
> I updated the wiki accordingly.
>
> Thanks,
> Josef
> _______________________________________________
> kde-sdk-devel mailing list
> kde-sdk-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-sdk-devel
_______________________________________________
kde-sdk-devel mailing list
kde-sdk-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-sdk-devel