[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-scm-interest
Subject:    Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs
From:       Chani <chanika () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-09-08 21:02:05
Message-ID: 201009081402.05936.chanika () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On September 8, 2010 13:32:19 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Chani wrote:
> > On September 8, 2010 03:21:38 zander@kde.org wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 7. September 2010 18.04.40 Tom Albers wrote:
> > now I'm gonna play devil^Wsysadmin's advocate for a minute here ;)
> > 
> > > Ignored disadvantages;
> > > * having each app in koffice as a repo and doing a refactor means
> > > you need to push to multiple repositories. Managing multiple
> > > repositories is not something that git is good at and as a result
> > > you will have to do multiple pushes yourself. This has a real-life
> > > effect on daily operations.
> > 
> > still, doing a refactor isn't a regular thing (one would hope) so I'd
> > count this as a minor annoyance.
> 
> For larger applications (like Kontact/KMail and probably also for
> KOffice) quite the contrary is true. When working on larger applications
> you will do a lot of refactoring whenever you add a new larger feature
> because otherwise the application will quickly become an unmaintainable
> mess.

ah. good to know.

> 
> Whether multiple separate pushes are a minor or major annoyance I cannot
> judge.

well, as someone who'll always be doing separate pushes to kdelibs and 
kdebase, I consider them minor :)

_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]