[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-scm-interest
Subject:    Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2010-09-08 20:32:19
Message-ID: 201009082232.25570 () thufir ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Chani wrote:
> On September 8, 2010 03:21:38 zander@kde.org wrote:
> > On Tuesday 7. September 2010 18.04.40 Tom Albers wrote:
> now I'm gonna play devil^Wsysadmin's advocate for a minute here ;)
> 
> > Ignored disadvantages;
> > * having each app in koffice as a repo and doing a refactor means
> > you need to push to multiple repositories. Managing multiple
> > repositories is not something that git is good at and as a result
> > you will have to do multiple pushes yourself. This has a real-life
> > effect on daily operations.
> 
> still, doing a refactor isn't a regular thing (one would hope) so I'd
> count this as a minor annoyance.

For larger applications (like Kontact/KMail and probably also for 
KOffice) quite the contrary is true. When working on larger applications 
you will do a lot of refactoring whenever you add a new larger feature 
because otherwise the application will quickly become an unmaintainable 
mess.

Whether multiple separate pushes are a minor or major annoyance I cannot 
judge.


Regards,
Ingo

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]