[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-release-team
Subject: Re: Fix Step infobrowser and examples localization for 19.12
From: Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date: 2019-11-26 23:17:57
Message-ID: 3492641.KZA7P9FSi9 () xps
[Download RAW message or body]
El dimarts, 26 de novembre de 2019, a les 19:46:44 CET, Yuri Chornoivan va escriure:
> Hi,
>
> Step infobrowser localization was somewhat broken during 19.12 release cycle.
>
> This can be fixed by the following differential revision:
>
> https://phabricator.kde.org/D25405
>
> The revision requires two new localization files, step_objinfo_files.po and
> step_example_files.po, for a translation locale to be present in the source
> archive of Step to localize descriptions, tutorials and examples at the build
> time.
Just so that I understand this correctly, previously l10n teams could provide their \
own .html files that would be shown by step.
This is broken in the 19.12 branch.
Your fix improves the situation by creating a .po file and then creating those .html \
files on compile time (besides making the .html files be used at all)
Am I right?
If so, this is "a bit" of a "l10n freeze break", right?
I mean it adds new strings in .po files that previously were translatable only \
translating the .html files manually (so they did not really influence stats)
Would you mind doing a quick round of asking in the l10n list if they would have any \
problem with having more .po stuff?
Besides that if you're confident we're not regressing the english text somehow I \
think it would probably be fine to have it in 19.12.
Cheers,
Albert
>
> The descriptions, tutorials and examples for locales without
> step_objinfo_files.po and step_example_files.po will not be localized
> silently. Step should readily build without them. The current script requires
> Python 2 to build the translation but there is a patch to port it to Python 3.
>
> https://phabricator.kde.org/D25532
>
> Is it possible to include this fix into 19.12 release this late in the release
> cycle or is it better to wait for the next release?
>
> Thanks in advance for your answers.
>
> Best regards,
> Yuri
>
>
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic