[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Release Team BoF Summary
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-07-13 17:44:38
Message-ID: 2952307.ukqlHHUbek () xps
[Download RAW message or body]

El Divendres, 13 de juliol de 2012, a les 14:31:35, Aurélien Gâteau va 
escriure:
> Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
> > So here comes the summary of the Release Team BoF, the attached picture is
> > all we wrote during the BoF itself so all written here is me trying to
> > remember what we said, if any of the presents disagrees or remembers more,
> > please do not hesitate to comment.
> 
> Something which we discussed in the KDE Quality BoF and is of interest to
> the KDE Release Team is the numbering of unstable versions.
> 
> Up to now we have been using 4.N.8* and 4.N.9* for alpha, beta and rc. The
> problem with those is it is difficult when you get a report on 4.8.85 to
> know if the user is running beta1, beta2, rc1 or something else.
> 
> To address this we proposed the following numbering scheme:
> 
> 4.N.7{1,2,3} => N+1 alpha 1, 2, 3
> 4.N.8{1,2,3} => N+1 beta 1, 2, 3
> 4.N.9{1,2,3} => N+1 rc 1, 2, 3
> 
> With this scheme, 4.10 alpha 1 would be 4.9.71, 4.10 beta 2 would be 4.9.82

This helps with remembering but breaks our "traditions", to be honest i don't 
care, any other opinion?

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Aurélien
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]