[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Release Team BoF Summary
From:       Aurélien_Gâteau <agateau () kde ! org>
Date:       2012-07-13 12:31:35
Message-ID: 1984849.9elTK3dAVC () trinity
[Download RAW message or body]

Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 20:43:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
> So here comes the summary of the Release Team BoF, the attached picture is
> all we wrote during the BoF itself so all written here is me trying to
> remember what we said, if any of the presents disagrees or remembers more,
> please do not hesitate to comment.

Something which we discussed in the KDE Quality BoF and is of interest to the 
KDE Release Team is the numbering of unstable versions.

Up to now we have been using 4.N.8* and 4.N.9* for alpha, beta and rc. The 
problem with those is it is difficult when you get a report on 4.8.85 to know if 
the user is running beta1, beta2, rc1 or something else.

To address this we proposed the following numbering scheme:

4.N.7{1,2,3} => N+1 alpha 1, 2, 3
4.N.8{1,2,3} => N+1 beta 1, 2, 3
4.N.9{1,2,3} => N+1 rc 1, 2, 3

With this scheme, 4.10 alpha 1 would be 4.9.71, 4.10 beta 2 would be 4.9.82

Aurélien
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]