[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Calling off Beta1
From:       "Wulf C. Krueger" <philantrop () exherbo ! org>
Date:       2012-05-29 17:59:02
Message-ID: 4FC50E66.9000908 () exherbo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 29.05.2012 19:51, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> 1) I fully support the idea that at a freeze things should be
> frozen. This was not ideal in the past, and it's great that you
> want to change it. Having a soprano version plus tarball to depend
> on is a great idea.

While I'm not happy about the KDE release process in general, I'm glad
someone finally stands up and enforces the rules - if it's not done
they'll never be followed.

> 2) However, how about giving people one release to get used to new
> things?

This is not new. It's just all too often been ignored.

On a personal side note, how about giving *Albert* one release to get
used to things? Let him pull this through, I'd say and a lot of
unhappy distro (and other) devs will make sure this dependency problem
will likely not occur again any time soon.

> So far some rules have been ignored, next time people will know
> that rules will not be ignored, fine.

That has been tried before and failed. No, thanks.

- -- 
Best regards, Wulf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/FDmYACgkQnuVXRcSi+5rQswCgkpqegUlbDqYYOxH4qHcVz1At
M5QAn3mA85uGibahZ7YQzobeBdg+asd5
=caPd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]