From kde-release-team Tue May 29 17:59:02 2012 From: "Wulf C. Krueger" Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:59:02 +0000 To: kde-release-team Subject: Re: Calling off Beta1 Message-Id: <4FC50E66.9000908 () exherbo ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-release-team&m=133831452908839 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 29.05.2012 19:51, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > 1) I fully support the idea that at a freeze things should be > frozen. This was not ideal in the past, and it's great that you > want to change it. Having a soprano version plus tarball to depend > on is a great idea. While I'm not happy about the KDE release process in general, I'm glad someone finally stands up and enforces the rules - if it's not done they'll never be followed. > 2) However, how about giving people one release to get used to new > things? This is not new. It's just all too often been ignored. On a personal side note, how about giving *Albert* one release to get used to things? Let him pull this through, I'd say and a lot of unhappy distro (and other) devs will make sure this dependency problem will likely not occur again any time soon. > So far some rules have been ignored, next time people will know > that rules will not be ignored, fine. That has been tried before and failed. No, thanks. - -- Best regards, Wulf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/FDmYACgkQnuVXRcSi+5rQswCgkpqegUlbDqYYOxH4qHcVz1At M5QAn3mA85uGibahZ7YQzobeBdg+asd5 =caPd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team