[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] Making Soprano optional (again) in kdelibs
From:       "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date:       2010-01-03 1:54:07
Message-ID: 201001021754.08289.aseigo () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On January 1, 2010, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> IMHO asking the packagers to split kdelibs is too much, if we want a split
> kdelibs is something we should do.

i don't think we want to split up kdelibs as that just makes development 
itself more annoying/difficult. it seems more like something that some 
packagers want to limit the size of dependencies. we could perhaps offer 
guidelines or even something in the build system that makes it more evident 
what the library layering is in kdelibs, though. i mean, you can certainly put 
libplasma in its own package without problem if you wanted to. doesn't require 
changes in kdelibs (other than touching plasma/CMakeLists.tx), but beyond that 
i think this is really a packaging decision issue.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]