[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: Qt MathML Widget
From:       Aleix Pol <aleixpol () kde ! org>
Date:       2009-03-20 14:29:26
Message-ID: 757d9a550903200729m7b6668efja7461ea03db08ff2 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM, John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2009/3/20 Aleix Pol <aleixpol@kde.org>:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Allen Winter <winter@kde.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> I assume we are all following the "Qt MathML Widget" discussion on
> k-c-d.
> >> Ideas on that issue?
> >>
> >> My first thought was sourceforge with some folks to maintain it there.
> >>
> >> kdesupport is basically the same as sourceforge, but somewhat easier
> >> to deal with.
> >>
> >> Would kdelibs be ok? doesn't feel "right" to go there, but I won't
> object
> >> if someone claims maintainership there.
> >>
> >> ??
> >>
> >> --
> >> Allen Winter | Software Engineer | 1-888-872-9339
> >> KDAB, Inc. | "Platform-independent software solutions"
> >> http://kdab.com | 1-866-777-5322 (US) | +46-563-540090 (Sweden)
> >
> > Referring to what thiago macieira said on the k-c-d list, I think that he
> > has his point.
> > We should only put it in kdelibs if we're forking it (what are your plans
> > john?) and renaming it.
>
> I think we almost certainly want to do this, and encourage people to
> expand on it.
>
>
> >
> > Otherwise I'd be fine if it is in a separate library in kdesupport, but
> > since they don't ensure ABI stability i'm not sure whether that would be
> a
> > good idea.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aleix
> >
> > PS: I'm not on this list, CC me if tehre is any other message on this
> > subject please.
> >
>

Wouldn't it be a better idea to keep the work on KFormula? we don't want 2
KDE codes doing the same thing!

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM, John Tapsell <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:johnflux@gmail.com">johnflux@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, \
204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> 2009/3/20 Aleix Pol &lt;<a \
href="mailto:aleixpol@kde.org">aleixpol@kde.org</a>&gt;:<br> <div class="im">&gt; On \
Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Allen Winter &lt;<a \
href="mailto:winter@kde.org">winter@kde.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Howdy,<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; I assume we are all following the &quot;Qt MathML Widget&quot; discussion on \
k-c-d.<br> &gt;&gt; Ideas on that issue?<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; My first thought was sourceforge with some folks to maintain it there.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; kdesupport is basically the same as sourceforge, but somewhat easier<br>
&gt;&gt; to deal with.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; Would kdelibs be ok? doesn&#39;t feel &quot;right&quot; to go there, but I \
won&#39;t object<br> &gt;&gt; if someone claims maintainership there.<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; ??<br>
&gt;&gt;<br>
&gt;&gt; --<br>
&gt;&gt; Allen Winter | Software Engineer | 1-888-872-9339<br>
&gt;&gt; KDAB, Inc. | &quot;Platform-independent software solutions&quot;<br>
&gt;&gt; <a href="http://kdab.com" target="_blank">http://kdab.com</a> | \
1-866-777-5322 (US) | +46-563-540090 (Sweden)<br> &gt;<br>
&gt; Referring to what thiago macieira said on the k-c-d list, I think that he<br>
&gt; has his point.<br>
&gt; We should only put it in kdelibs if we&#39;re forking it (what are your \
plans<br> &gt; john?) and renaming it.<br>
<br>
</div>I think we almost certainly want to do this, and encourage people to<br>
expand on it.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Otherwise I&#39;d be fine if it is in a separate library in kdesupport, but<br>
&gt; since they don&#39;t ensure ABI stability i&#39;m not sure whether that would be \
a<br> &gt; good idea.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Thanks,<br>
&gt; Aleix<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; PS: I&#39;m not on this list, CC me if tehre is any other message on this<br>
&gt; subject please.<br>
&gt;<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>Wouldn&#39;t it be a better idea to keep the work \
on KFormula? we don&#39;t want 2 KDE codes doing the same thing!<br><br>



_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic