[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-release-team
Subject:    Re: kdeutils cleanup
From:       Andras Mantia <amantia () kde ! org>
Date:       2008-04-18 16:12:51
Message-ID: 200804181913.03047.amantia () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 18 April 2008, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> I guess we agree that every program should have some kind of active
> maintainer, some people who feel responsible for it and have
> sufficient knowledge about it, if it is included in a KDE module.

This would be the ideal world. But even kdelibs has code that does not 
have any active maintainer, and I'm sure that is true for other code in 
other modules.
If the application works, doesn't have any serious reported bug, there 
is not need to move to unmaintained. I'd actually be sad if such thing 
happens. 
Of course if it doesn't even compile, it is unusable or such and nobody 
cares about it, it can be moved away.

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]