[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-quality
Subject:    DANGER Fedora
From:       berk () upnet ! ru (Stanislav Karchebny)
Date:       2004-05-15 13:55:13
Message-ID: 200405151755.29200.berk () upnet ! ru
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 01 May 2004 11:38, James Richard Tyrer wrote:

> >>Stanislav Karchebny wrote:
> >>>I propose contact fedore packages maintainer(s) directly instead
> >>>of spamming the ml. We would love to hear their feedback instead,
> >>>gladly.
> >>>Trolling us all with engineering quality rants is not a good
> >>>attitude either.
[snip]
> I just thought that Stanislav Karchebny's remark was indicative of the
> problem.  Discussions of design/engineering and quality are considered to
> be SPAM by developers.
[snip]

I said "rants", I didn't say "constructive talk" tho.

I am all open for architecture discussion that is taken from a design point of 
view, not from some ranting like "You stupid developers don't see the 
enlightenment I bring and therefore you suck." Neither it that we can't stand 
your light - we're just having our fun and let others have their.
Design is good, and in this matter a design of fedore can be much improved.

-- 
keep in touch. berkus.

Roey on #kde-devel: when I hear best of breed I tune out--it's too much a
buzzword. What I carry between my legs is best of breed. And like KDE, just
because it's less visible doesn't mean it gets less usage.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]