[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-promo
Subject: Re: [kde-promo] dot and kdenews
From: Justin Kirby <justin () neomantra ! org>
Date: 2010-05-10 14:09:18
Message-ID: AANLkTikqYiS7tt8sxerP7e-aO2zze3vWmoLXKFIyiJ2- () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Lydia Pintscher <lydia@kde.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:21, Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvliet@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Stuart Jarvis <stuart.jarvis@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> So the second influences the first a bit - I can't just write, publish
> and
> >> forget... Would we favour saying any editor can write a short summary to
> an
> >> article on another site and publish it immediately without review or
> >> discussing scheduling? So we wouldn't care if one of these mini articles
> >> appeared on the same day as a big one. Less chance for typos, probably
> no pics
> >> and only one link... Is that how it used to work?
> >
> > Yes, it is, and yes, I agree. I rarely feel the urge to write such
> > small things but if others do - please go ahead and indeed, publish
> > them, as they're of little consequence. However. They CAN push
> > important articles down - I have no problem publishing them shortly
> > BEFORE an important article, but once that is out it would be a shame
> > to move it down too quickly. So as long as we can make sure that
> > doesn't happen - publish away.
>
> Honestly? Publishing without at least one review is a no-go. Doesn't
> matter how small the article is. And it is a lot easier to get
> reviewers for 5 lines than a 2 page interview.
>
>
I agree with Lydia. Letting things go through without a review would be
likely to degrade the official-ness and quality of Dot articles. Anything
worth posting is worth reviewing imo.
>
> Cheers
> Lydia
>
> --
> Lydia Pintscher
> Amarok community manager
> kde.org - amarok.kde.org - kubuntu.org
> claimid.com/nightrose
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
>
> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set
> digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Lydia Pintscher \
<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lydia@kde.org">lydia@kde.org</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; \
border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im">On \
Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:21, Jos Poortvliet <<a \
href="mailto:jospoortvliet@gmail.com">jospoortvliet@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> > \
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Stuart Jarvis <<a \
href="mailto:stuart.jarvis@gmail.com">stuart.jarvis@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> \
</div><div class="im">>> So the second influences the first a bit - I can't \
just write, publish and<br> >> forget... Would we favour saying any editor can \
write a short summary to an<br> >> article on another site and publish it \
immediately without review or<br> >> discussing scheduling? So we wouldn't \
care if one of these mini articles<br> >> appeared on the same day as a big \
one. Less chance for typos, probably no pics<br> >> and only one link... Is \
that how it used to work?<br> ><br>
> Yes, it is, and yes, I agree. I rarely feel the urge to write such<br>
> small things but if others do - please go ahead and indeed, publish<br>
> them, as they're of little consequence. However. They CAN push<br>
> important articles down - I have no problem publishing them shortly<br>
> BEFORE an important article, but once that is out it would be a shame<br>
> to move it down too quickly. So as long as we can make sure that<br>
> doesn't happen - publish away.<br>
<br>
</div>Honestly? Publishing without at least one review is a no-go. Doesn't<br>
matter how small the article is. And it is a lot easier to get<br>
reviewers for 5 lines than a 2 page interview.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>I agree with Lydia. Letting things go through without a \
review would be likely to degrade the official-ness and quality of Dot articles. \
Anything worth posting is worth reviewing imo.<br> </div> <blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, \
204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <br>
Cheers<br>
Lydia<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Lydia Pintscher<br>
Amarok community manager<br>
<a href="http://kde.org" target="_blank">kde.org</a> - <a \
href="http://amarok.kde.org" target="_blank">amarok.kde.org</a> - <a \
href="http://kubuntu.org" target="_blank">kubuntu.org</a><br> <a \
href="http://claimid.com/nightrose" target="_blank">claimid.com/nightrose</a><br> \
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br> \
_______________________________________________<br> This message is from the \
kde-promo mailing list.<br> <br>
Visit <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo</a> to unsubscribe, \
set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.<br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on \
or temporarily stop your subscription.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic