[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-promo
Subject: Re: [kde-promo] KDE Myths Facts Check
From: Kurt Pfeifle <k1pfeifle () gmx ! net>
Date: 2005-11-26 17:42:26
Message-ID: 200511261837.51188.k1pfeifle () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On Saturday 26 November 2005 16:34, Mihnea Capraru wrote:
> On Saturday 26 November 2005 18:47, Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 November 2005 13:08, Mihnea Capraru wrote:
> > > I've given myth 65 'Qt is not free enough' a second run:
> > >
> > > http://kdemyths.urbanlizard.com/myth/65
> > >
> > > If the text seems not clear enough, or not well focused, or plain wrong,
> > > please tell me.
> >
> > Without commenting on details of the content (I didnt read it), I just
> > want to repeat: this still features the "title -- myth -- facts" trinity.
> [...]
>
> After thinking at it a bit more, I suggest that we use a myth/facts structure, with this peculiarity:
>
> - we use a short text for the myths as they occur on the index pages
>
> e.g. "Qt is Not Free Enough"
>
> - and we append more to it on the myths page
Yes. Just make sure that it doesnt sound too boring or "neutral".
Keep the wording of the "myth" part a bit provocative (and contrast
it to the "facts", which should be presented calmly and in a sober
way.
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /></head><body \
style="font-size:13pt;font-family:Courier New"> <p>On Saturday 26 November 2005 \
16:34, Mihnea Capraru wrote:</p> <p>> On Saturday 26 November 2005 18:47, Kurt \
Pfeifle wrote:</p> <p>> > On Saturday 26 November 2005 13:08, Mihnea Capraru \
wrote:</p> <p>> > > I've given myth 65 'Qt is not free enough' a second \
run:</p> <p>> > ></p>
<p>> > > http://kdemyths.urbanlizard.com/myth/65</p>
<p>> > ></p>
<p>> > > If the text seems not clear enough, or not well focused, or plain \
wrong,</p> <p>> > > please tell me.</p>
<p>> ></p>
<p>> > Without commenting on details of the content (I didnt read it), I \
just</p> <p>> > want to repeat: this still features the "title -- myth -- \
facts" trinity.</p> <p>> [...]</p>
<p>> </p>
<p>> After thinking at it a bit more, I suggest that we use a myth/facts \
structure, with this peculiarity: </p> <p>> </p>
<p>> - we use a short text for the myths as they occur on the index pages</p>
<p>> </p>
<p>> e.g. "Qt is Not Free Enough"</p>
<p>> </p>
<p>> - and we append more to it on the myths page</p>
<p></p>
<p>Yes. Just make sure that it doesnt sound too boring or "neutral".</p>
<p>Keep the wording of the "myth" part a bit provocative (and contrast</p>
<p>it to the "facts", which should be presented calmly and in a sober</p>
<p>way.</p>
</body></html>
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on \
or temporarily stop your subscription.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic