[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-pim
Subject: Re: [Kde-pim] Proposal: KSharedFile
From: Ingo Assenmacher <ingo.assenmacher () post ! rwth-aachen ! de>
Date: 2001-12-13 12:29:40
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi Nick!
Am Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2001 02:43 schrieben Sie:
> Ingo Assenmacher <mlists@cognitivemicrosystems.net> writes:
>
> Your argument for using a database is so multiple (not same
> machine) clients to have access to a shared IM repository.
>
> I claim this is needed, but not my reasons for choosing a database backend.
>
> The immediate need of a database backend would allow:
>
> - Ease of data exchange between multiple PIM applications.
>
> - Ability to perform atomic operations on data records.
>
> - Data storage that would easily facilitate changes in the type
> information stored. (Upgrades to Korganizer? A new PIM
> application)
>
> - Clean method of storage with clear API for retreiving and
> setting information
>
> - A centralized place to store a user's critical information.
> *Sidenote: When I use Outlook, I like how it stores all data
> in a db file called outlook.pst. I back this up
> and I am sure all my PIM data was backed up.
Right, besides the points for a pooled-data storage, most of the above RQ are
met by using vCal-standard, is it not? This is supported by at least 99% of
the PIM apps existing (most probably 100%).
Some points have to be done manually, but are possible.
> Anyway, I'm probabally preaching about something I don't have time to
> implement now. I'm already in the middle codign a GPL'd IEEE 1149.1 JTAG
> programmer. :)
Right, I am busy, too. So I constrainted myself to look into this over and
after christmas. Happy coding to you.
Regards, Ingo.
_______________________________________________
kde-pim mailing list
kde-pim@mail.kde.org
http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic