[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: Review Request 128097: optional mode to draw checked menu items with only a check mark
From:       René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin () gmail ! com>
Date:       2016-06-05 12:40:40
Message-ID: 20160605124040.29452.12644 () mimi ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

--===============5360447384087071342==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



> On June 5, 2016, 2:11 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > First of all, as for any visual changes: Please provide before/after screenshots \
> > so that designers can do visual reviews. 
> > Second: I am strictly against making this an option. Either it's an improvement, \
> > then it should always be like that, or it isn't an improvement, than it should be \
> > dropped. We should not offer a config option for every tine tweak, it just \
> > overcomplicates our config UIs for little gain. This is not something so \
> > fundamental that that some users _need_ it while others _can't stand it_. 
> > So: The VDG will decide - after we've seen screenshots - whether checked menu \
> > items should use a checkmark or not, but making this an option will never get a \
> > "ship it" from the usability side.

I'm sorry, but that's should be up to the QtCurve developers to decide. QtCurve is \
also a pure Qt style, and AFAIK not at the same level as Oxygen and Breeze. It's the \
highly-configurable widget style, and as such the style's users should have the final \
say what options are to get in or not, in my opinion. Having a VDG is nice, but it \
should never have complete dictatorship over everything.

And yes, I do think it's exactly something that some might need (distinguishing \
exclusive menu items from non-exclusive ones) while some cannot stand that because \
such a visual difference doesn't correspond to their idea of HIG.


- René J.V.


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128097/#review96200
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 4, 2016, 9:53 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128097/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 4, 2016, 9:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X, Plasma and Yichao Yu.
> 
> 
> Repository: qtcurve
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This introduces an option (hidden for now) to adorn checked menu items with only a \
> check mark rather than the same widget that is used for checkboxes or radio buttons \
> (for sets of mutually exclusive menu items). 
> Initially I implemented this by simply skipping the widget "box" and drawing only \
> the checkbox tick for both kinds of menu items (cf. \
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363895). I then realised that this looks weird \
> when the user uses a very tall or tiny font (or has a high DPI screen). Therefore \
> the check is now generated using the UniCode `Check Mark` glyph (? cf. \
> http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2713/index.htm) rendered in the menu \
> font (or `Apple Symbols`, on OS X). 
> A new member is introduced in the `Options` structure that controls this new \
> behaviour. Its value is read from and written to the config file, but I have not \
> yet implemented its UI control through the configuration interface. I'll want some \
> guidance for that step. 
> I propose to make this the default behaviour on OS X, so that popup menus can be \
> closer in appearance to the native menus from the toplevel menubar (those menus are \
> not rendered through Qt, and use a single check mark too). 
> The GTk2 style already rendered checked menu items like this so I did not change \
> anything there (and don't really plan to touch that code at all). 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
> gtk2/common/common.h cb0ec87 
> gtk2/common/config_file.cpp 96936e2 
> qt4/common/common.h 313db33 
> qt4/common/config_file.cpp c58ad1a 
> qt4/style/qtcurve.cpp 951ec1a 
> qt5/common/common.h bb103fd 
> qt5/common/config_file.cpp 362381a 
> qt5/style/qtcurve_api.cpp b8535da 
> qt5/style/qtcurve_primitive.cpp a8a2bed 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128097/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> On OS X 10.9 and Linux with Qt 4.8.7 and Qt 5.6.0 .
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> René J.V. Bertin
> 
> 


--===============5360447384087071342==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit




<html>
 <body>
  <div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
   <table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="12" style="border: 1px #c9c399 \
solid; border-radius: 6px; -moz-border-radius: 6px; -webkit-border-radius: 6px;">  \
<tr>  <td>
      This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
      <a href="https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128097/">https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128097/</a>
  </td>
    </tr>
   </table>
   <br />





<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: \
10px;">  <p style="margin-top: 0;">On June 5th, 2016, 2:11 p.m. CEST, <b>Thomas \
Pfeiffer</b> wrote:</p>  <blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid \
#d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">  <pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: \
-moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: \
break-word;"><p style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: \
inherit;white-space: inherit;">First of all, as for any visual changes: Please \
provide before/after screenshots so that designers can do visual reviews.</p> <p \
style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: inherit;white-space: \
inherit;">Second: I am strictly against making this an option. Either it's an \
improvement, then it should always be like that, or it isn't an improvement, than it \
should be dropped. We should not offer a config option for every tine tweak, it just \
overcomplicates our config UIs for little gain. This is not something so fundamental \
that that some users <em style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: \
0;line-height: inherit;white-space: normal;">need</em> it while others <em \
style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: inherit;white-space: \
normal;">can't stand it</em>.</p> <p style="padding: 0;text-rendering: \
inherit;margin: 0;line-height: inherit;white-space: inherit;">So: The VDG will decide \
- after we've seen screenshots - whether checked menu items should use a checkmark or \
not, but making this an option will never get a "ship it" from the usability \
side.</p></pre>  </blockquote>







</blockquote>

<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: \
-pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;"><p style="padding: \
0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: inherit;white-space: inherit;">I'm \
sorry, but that's should be up to the QtCurve developers to decide. QtCurve is also a \
pure Qt style, and AFAIK not at the same level as Oxygen and Breeze. It's the \
highly-configurable widget style, and as such the style's users should have the final \
say what options are to get in or not, in my opinion. Having a VDG is nice, but it \
should never have complete dictatorship over everything.</p> <p style="padding: \
0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: inherit;white-space: inherit;">And \
yes, I do think it's exactly something that some might need (distinguishing exclusive \
menu items from non-exclusive ones) while some cannot stand that because such a \
visual difference doesn't correspond to their idea of HIG.</p></pre> <br />










<p>- René J.V.</p>


<br />
<p>On June 4th, 2016, 9:53 p.m. CEST, René J.V. Bertin wrote:</p>








<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="12" style="border: \
1px #888a85 solid; border-radius: 6px; -moz-border-radius: 6px; \
-webkit-border-radius: 6px;">  <tr>
  <td>

<div>Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X, Plasma and Yichao Yu.</div>
<div>By René J.V. Bertin.</div>


<p style="color: grey;"><i>Updated June 4, 2016, 9:53 p.m.</i></p>









<div style="margin-top: 1.5em;">
 <b style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt;">Repository: </b>
qtcurve
</div>


<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
 <table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" \
style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">  <tr>
  <td>
   <pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: \
-moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: \
break-word;"><p style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: \
inherit;white-space: inherit;">This introduces an option (hidden for now) to adorn \
checked menu items with only a check mark rather than the same widget that is used \
for checkboxes or radio buttons (for sets of mutually exclusive menu items).</p> <p \
style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: inherit;white-space: \
inherit;">Initially I implemented this by simply skipping the widget "box" and \
drawing only the checkbox tick for both kinds of menu items (cf. \
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363895). I then realised that this looks weird \
when the user uses a very tall or tiny font (or has a high DPI screen). Therefore the \
check is now generated using the UniCode <code style="text-rendering: inherit;color: \
#4444cc;padding: 0;white-space: normal;margin: 0;line-height: inherit;">Check \
Mark</code> glyph (? cf. http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2713/index.htm) \
rendered in the menu font (or <code style="text-rendering: inherit;color: \
#4444cc;padding: 0;white-space: normal;margin: 0;line-height: inherit;">Apple \
Symbols</code>, on OS X).</p> <p style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: \
0;line-height: inherit;white-space: inherit;">A new member is introduced in the <code \
style="text-rendering: inherit;color: #4444cc;padding: 0;white-space: normal;margin: \
0;line-height: inherit;">Options</code> structure that controls this new behaviour. \
Its value is read from and written to the config file, but I have not yet implemented \
its UI control through the configuration interface. I'll want some guidance for that \
step.</p> <p style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: \
inherit;white-space: inherit;">I propose to make this the default behaviour on OS X, \
so that popup menus can be closer in appearance to the native menus from the toplevel \
menubar (those menus are not rendered through Qt, and use a single check mark \
too).</p> <p style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: \
inherit;white-space: inherit;">The GTk2 style already rendered checked menu items \
like this so I did not change anything there (and don't really plan to touch that \
code at all).</p></pre>  </td>
 </tr>
</table>


<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Testing </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: \
1px solid #b8b5a0">  <tr>
  <td>
   <pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: \
-moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: \
break-word;"><p style="padding: 0;text-rendering: inherit;margin: 0;line-height: \
inherit;white-space: inherit;">On OS X 10.9 and Linux with Qt 4.8.7 and Qt 5.6.0 \
.</p></pre>  </td>
 </tr>
</table>


<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> </h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">

 <li>gtk2/common/common.h <span style="color: grey">(cb0ec87)</span></li>

 <li>gtk2/common/config_file.cpp <span style="color: grey">(96936e2)</span></li>

 <li>qt4/common/common.h <span style="color: grey">(313db33)</span></li>

 <li>qt4/common/config_file.cpp <span style="color: grey">(c58ad1a)</span></li>

 <li>qt4/style/qtcurve.cpp <span style="color: grey">(951ec1a)</span></li>

 <li>qt5/common/common.h <span style="color: grey">(bb103fd)</span></li>

 <li>qt5/common/config_file.cpp <span style="color: grey">(362381a)</span></li>

 <li>qt5/style/qtcurve_api.cpp <span style="color: grey">(b8535da)</span></li>

 <li>qt5/style/qtcurve_primitive.cpp <span style="color: grey">(a8a2bed)</span></li>

</ul>

<p><a href="https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128097/diff/" style="margin-left: \
3em;">View Diff</a></p>






  </td>
 </tr>
</table>







  </div>
 </body>
</html>


--===============5360447384087071342==--


[Attachment #3 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic