[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-panel-devel
Subject:    Re: [Panel-devel] Data engine questions
From:       James Smith <smithjd15 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-11-26 6:54:07
Message-ID: 200711252354.08190.smithjd15 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Should that be implemented using Nepomuk metadata? I am not familiar with the 
implementation but if it's just a quick call Nepomuk would be the solution to 
keep everything consistent across the entire desktop. Tick, increment based 
on file inode / name.

On November 24, 2007 09:49:27 pm Ryan Bitanga wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Does anyone know of any way I can send messages to a data engine? I
> need to communicate with a data engine to get the data engine to
> update itself but I won't necessarily use QObjects so signals and
> slots aren't viable. I wanted communication to occur only through the
> methods of DataEngine so I don't have to include the header file of
> that specific data engine. Currently, the only solution I can think of
> is using query( msg ), parsing the message in sourceRequested() then
> returning false from sourceRequested(). Is there a better way of doing
> this?
>
> I'm writing a data engine to record application launch statistics so
> application launchers could share a common way of recording recently
> launched applications as well as launch frequency. However, writing
> the data engine isn't as simple as I had hoped. Data engines are more
> suitable for receiving signals from objects that aren't connected to
> it, e.g. filesystem and network information, or accepting input with
> an associated output. However, there seems to be no lightweight
> message passing, e.g. sending a string to the data engine without
> needing an associated data object. The query method returns an unused
> empty Data object and seems quite wasteful. Even a signal and slot
> implementation would require me to include the header file of the data
> engine, so I could connect an applicationLaunched() signal to a slot
> in the data engine. Would I be better off creating a non-data engine
> class?
>
> A data engine would allow the information to be shared with a quick
> launch plasmoid, which would need to notify the data engine of
> additional launches itself, but a non-data engine would give allow me
> to use a more suitable API.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> - Ryan
> _______________________________________________
> Panel-devel mailing list
> Panel-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/panel-devel
_______________________________________________
Panel-devel mailing list
Panel-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/panel-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]