[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-multimedia
Subject: Re: kdemultimedia and svn -> git
From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <kde () carewolf ! com>
Date: 2011-01-14 18:33:29
Message-ID: 201101141933.29493.kde () carewolf ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 16:22, George Kiagiadakis
>
> <kiagiadakis.george@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2011/1/12 Allan Sandfeld Jensen <kde@carewolf.com>:
> >> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Ian Monroe wrote:
> >>> So we should move to Git. Its what folks are doing.
> >>>
> >>> I think it would make sense to split up kdemultimedia into several
> >>> different modules.
> >>
> >> Oh God NO!!!!
> >>
> >> Please please do NOT split up any more modules, you are making
> >> developing for KDE absolute hell.
> >
> > Why is that a hell? What's wrong with it? And what "more" modules? Did
> > anybody split anything else yet?
>
> We just did kdebindings, and thats the only KDE module to split so far
> AFAIK. kdebindings as one module was pretty hellish, I think anyone
> who has tried to build it can agree.
>
I agree with splitting kdebindings, especially because some parts of it was
not installable without modifying /usr which I didn't want to.
Is there an option to split modules and still make it possible to deal with
them collectively (like you can in SVN with extragear for instance). The use-
case is parttime library developers who just wants the standard KDE
application that uses the modifying custom kdelibs and core modules? Having
multiple KDE installations, some from distro, some build from sources, is not
really a desirable solution, and the alternative is that developers are not
eating our own dogfood.
`Allan
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" \
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"> <html><head><meta name="qrichtext" \
content="1" /><style type="text/css"> p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Monospace'; font-size:11pt; \
font-weight:400; font-style:normal;"> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Ian Monroe wrote:</p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at \
16:22, George Kiagiadakis</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> </p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> <kiagiadakis.george@gmail.com> wrote:</p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> > 2011/1/12 Allan \
Sandfeld Jensen <kde@carewolf.com>:</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> >> On Wednesday 12 January 2011, Ian \
Monroe wrote:</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; \
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> \
>>> So we should move to Git. Its what folks are doing.</p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> >>> </p> <p \
style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> >>> I think it \
would make sense to split up kdemultimedia into several</p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> >>> different \
modules.</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; \
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> \
>> </p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; \
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> \
>> Oh God NO!!!!</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> >> </p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> >> Please please do NOT split up any more modules, you \
are making</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; \
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> \
>> developing for KDE absolute hell.</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> > </p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> > Why is that a hell? What's wrong with \
it? And what "more" modules? Did</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> > anybody split anything else yet?</p> <p \
style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> </p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> We just did kdebindings, \
and thats the only KDE module to split so far</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; \
margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; \
text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> AFAIK. kdebindings as one module was pretty \
hellish, I think anyone</p> <p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; \
margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; \
-qt-user-state:0;">> who has tried to build it can agree.</p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">> </p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">I agree with splitting \
kdebindings, especially because some parts of it was not installable without \
modifying /usr which I didn't want to. </p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br /></p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">Is there an option to split \
modules and still make it possible to deal with them collectively (like you can in \
SVN with extragear for instance). The use-case is parttime library developers who \
just wants the standard KDE application that uses the modifying custom kdelibs and \
core modules? Having multiple KDE installations, some from distro, some build from \
sources, is not really a desirable solution, and the alternative is that developers \
are not eating our own dogfood.</p> <p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br /></p> <p style=" \
margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; \
-qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">`Allan</p></body></html>
_______________________________________________
kde-multimedia mailing list
kde-multimedia@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic