[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-maemo
Subject:    [Kde-maemo] which to "optify" (is: KDE packaging for Maemo)
From:       menard () kde ! org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alexis_M=E9nard?=)
Date:       2010-02-01 9:30:56
Message-ID: 81941aea1002010130k32358762te7067bc8aff23f9 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2010/2/1 Kevin Ottens <ervin at kde.org>:
> On Monday 1 February 2010 10:10:09 Alexis M?nard wrote:
>> 2010/2/1 Kevin Ottens <ervin at kde.org>:
>> > I think we could aim at something like this:
>> > ?- /opt/qt4-maemo5, which is current prefix for Qt 4.6
>>
>> This will change when the final release will be out. The next big
>> firmware update will probably put it in the usual path.
>
> Sure, I purposefully ignored that fact though as really it doesn't make a big
> difference for us. It'll be just /opt/qt4-maemo5 becoming /usr. ;-)
>
> Note that doing so in Fremantle is a risk for Nokia though, as there's
> apparently quite a few Qt 4.5 + Maemo extensions apps out there for the N900,
> and that AFAIK the Qt 4.6 Maemo extensions are rather not compatible with the
> former ones... So suddenly those third party apps would break.
>

Yep, that's why i fully encourage them to do like on the iPhone, i.e.
tags on the app

"Firmware 1.1 compatible"
"Firmware 1.2 compatible"

And via a proper beta campaign to "force" 3rd party developers to test
their app with the upcoming firmware.

> But as I said, doesn't make a difference for us, we depend on Qt 4.6 anyway.
>
> Regards.
> --
> K?vin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
>
> KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-maemo mailing list
> Kde-maemo at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-maemo
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]