[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-mac
Subject:    Re: [KDE/Mac] Packaging (was Re: [rkward-users] problem installing
From:       Mike Arthur <mike () mikearthur ! co ! uk>
Date:       2010-05-10 17:47:32
Message-ID: 57D9F258-41F9-489F-8553-FC7FD1BB3BC7 () mikearthur ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]


On 10 May 2010, at 18:36, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:

> On Monday, May 10, 2010, Mike Arthur wrote:
> > Personally I'm all for developers being told that Qt applications are \
> > FAR more portable than KDE applications. I'd go as far as to say that \
> > there are no KDE applications that are ported and packaged sufficiently \
> > for novice end-users on Windows or Mac. There are plenty of Qt \
> > applications that meet this requirement.
> 
> And what do you propose to solve this problem? I don't expect that we, \
> Linux  developers with not much experience as Mac users (not to mention \
> as  packagers) could do a great job packaging applications ourselves.

There are two solutions to this problem:
1) Make your applications so they optionally depend on KDELibs rather than \
always 2) Help with making KDELibs more modular

I get you about the packaging thing but this is open-source, if your users \
are demanding Mac packages then you should get them to help out.

--
Cheers,
Mike Arthur
http://mikearthur.co.uk



_______________________________________________
kde-mac@kde.org
List Information: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-mac
KDE/Mac Information: \
http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Projects/KDE_on_Mac_OS_X


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]