[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-linux
Subject:    Re: [kde-linux] Has The performance been forgotten?
From:       Thujan <tuxakka () yahoo ! co ! uk>
Date:       2004-10-10 6:15:19
Message-ID: 200410100915.19350.tuxakka () yahoo ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 09 October 2004 20:19, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> On Saturday 09 October 2004 03:22 am, Bahram Alinezhad wrote:
> > Cure this ill OS!
> >
> > Don't believe me, test by yourself!
>
> This message smells highly of flame bait.. Go somewhere else with this
> crap. Its doesnt take 30 minutes to get through 9%..
>
> Go away.

I have tested and found out that in my hardware pc 1,5ghz + 768mb ram
far most slowest loader is win2k pro.
Win 9x series are fast for a while but cause bad memory management they
starts to slow down even less as an hour depends what tasks you do
with it .
Also red lately large benchmark test for different systems on i386
And slowest was
OpenBSD  (probably cause security?)
Second slowest was
WinNT-serie kernel 
Then came
NetBSD
Third position took 
Linux-2.4
First runner up was
FreeBSD 5.x serie
And most fastest in every single task was
Linux-2.6
Everybody who use i386 (pc) hardware get most out of it
with Linux-2.6 and that's fact which can be tested anytime.
 

-- 
best rgds
thujan   :0           Oct 10 08:19 (console)
Linux wilma 2.6.5-7.108-default #1 Wed Aug 25 13:34:40 UTC 2004 i686 i686 i386 
GNU/Linux
___________________________________________________
This message is from the kde-linux mailing list.
Account management:  https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-linux.
Archives: http://lists.kde.org/.
More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]