[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-licensing
Subject: Re: QT Designer _NOT_ under QPL.
From: Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP () dfo-mpo ! gc ! ca>
Date: 2000-08-18 18:56:31
[Download RAW message or body]
mosfet wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > mosfet wrote:
> >
> > > Under the current QPL, it is explictly stated that *everything* supplied
> > > by Troll Tech for Qt packages must be included.
> >
> > 2. You may copy and distribute the Software in unmodified form
> > provided that the entire package, including - but not restricted
> > to - copyright, trademark notices and disclaimers, as released
> > by the initial developer of the Software, is distributed.
> >
> > Where do they define `package' as all binaries that can be
> > generated by the source? I don't see it.
> >
>
> Hehe, this is pretty silly. I don't know if I should respond or not but
> the package refers to the official tarballs you download off of Troll
> Tech, and all the binaries include all the binaries built by Troll Tech
> when you type "make" ;-)
Where is that defined? The package is the source tar ball.
Where does it say `plus all the binaries built by Troll Tech when
you type "make"'
> No, no source is included. It's a binary package, remember? But the
> binaries must follow the QPL,
Making all source code available...
> and the QPL clearly states that you must
> include all the tools and misc things provided by Troll Tech.
It does _not_ say that anywhere.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic