[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: QT Designer _NOT_ under QPL.
From:       Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP () dfo-mpo ! gc ! ca>
Date:       2000-08-18 18:56:31
[Download RAW message or body]


mosfet wrote:

> Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > 
> > mosfet wrote:
> > 
> > > Under the current QPL, it is explictly stated that *everything* supplied
> > > by Troll Tech for Qt packages must be included.
> > 
> >  2. You may copy and distribute the Software in unmodified form
> >  provided that the entire package, including - but not restricted
> >  to - copyright, trademark notices and disclaimers, as released
> >  by the initial developer of the Software, is distributed.
> > 
> > Where do they define `package' as all binaries that can be
> > generated by the source?  I don't see it.
> > 
> 
> Hehe, this is pretty silly. I don't know if I should respond or not but
> the package refers to the official tarballs you download off of Troll
> Tech, and all the binaries include all the binaries built by Troll Tech
> when you type "make" ;-)

Where is that defined?  The package is the source tar ball.
Where does it say `plus all the binaries built by Troll Tech when
you type "make"'

> No, no source is included. It's a binary package, remember? But the
> binaries must follow the QPL, 

Making all source code available...

>                               and the QPL clearly states that you must
> include all the tools and misc things provided by Troll Tech.

It does _not_ say that anywhere.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic