[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: [freeqt] Re: FreeQt concerns
From:       "Tom" <tom () hooked ! net>
Date:       1998-04-05 17:39:10
[Download RAW message or body]

Is this a mailing list? 
If so, please remove "alex" <root@hooked.net>, and if possible can the list
administrator forward the headders of the message used to subscribe the account.
I need to contact our user to inform them of their misconfigured mail client.


Thanks,

Tom Jansen - Sysadmin
Whole Earth Networks
mknod /dev/spam c 2 2 ; chmod 666 /dev/spam ; echo " >/dev/spam" > ~/.forward

On Sun, 05 Apr 1998 19:31:30 +0200, Martin Konold writes:
>On Sun, 5 Apr 1998, Alex wrote:
>
>> smeared by the GPL will still require Gtk.  Also, Qt doesn't AFAIK force
>> comercial distributors such as Suse or Walnut Creek to pay royalties,
>> otherwise what were you talking about?
>
>True! As a matter of fact qt does NOT require run time license fees. IMHO
>lesstiff was neede because the developers of _free_ sw did not want to buy
>motif and much _more_ important the gpl'd Motif stuff was not widely used
>because it requierd the distributors/end users to buy a motif runtime
>license.
>
>YOurs,
>-- martin
>
>Linus: "Microsoft makes bad programs but they have good user interfaces"
>Stefan: "Even Linus can be wrong..."
>Torben: "Linus is not wrong, but KDE people make VERY good user interfaces"
>             *** KDE the choice of a GUI generation ***
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]