[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: Updated Licence Draft
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-1?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2007-11-27 23:48:34
Message-ID: 200711280048.34484 () erwin ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 23 November 2007, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:22:01AM +0000, Alex Merry wrote:
> > There are also several that said v2+ but not v2/v3/e.v.  I'm not
> > sure how we reconcile with those who say v2/v3/e.v. but not v2+ if
> > they worked on the same file...
>
> Just note that the file contains code under both terms, it'll come
> down to the lower common denominator which would be v2/v3/e.v.

No, it'll come down to the intersection of v2+ and v2/v3/e.v. which is 
{v2, v3, any v2+ license approved by the e.V.}. Relicensing under an 
arbitrary license approved by the e.V. would not be possible.


Regards,
Ingo

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Kde-licensing mailing list
Kde-licensing@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]