[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kuml-devel
Subject:    Re: Fw: Status on the kUML project.
From:       Gerard Flynn <gerard.flynn () free ! fr>
Date:       2001-08-28 18:55:07
[Download RAW message or body]

Darius GMX wrote:

>Hi,
>
>here is a message I've got from one of the kdevelop peoples two days ago.
>
>They are planning to integrate an UML tool into kdevelop.
>
>Feel free to send them your two cents on this topic.I'll send them a mail
>tomorrow.
>The editor for kuml still need more work. But maybe they can utilize the
>library component of kuml (if it reached a state of being usable) for
>kdevelop for the beginning.
>
>In my opinion it would be much better to integrate a full CASE tool into
>kdevelop, not just an simple UML painter like kivio.
>
>___________________________
>Darius Stachow, Germany/Hamburg
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tarjei Knapstad" <tarjeik@chemcon.no>
>To: <stacho_d@informatik.fh-hamburg.de>
>Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:00 AM
>Subject: Status on the kUML project.
>
>
>>Hi Darius.
>>
>>The KDevelop team is planning on integrating an UML editor into the Gideon
>>(3.0) release. Currently the choice stands between Kivio and kUML.
>>
>>>From your web pages kUML seems to have kept a low activity level for the
>>last year. Are you still working on it? In which state is the CVS code?
>>Will you continue working on it? In short: What's your status? :)
>>
>>Have a nice weekend mate!
>>
>>Cheers,
>>--
>>Tarjei Knapstad, MSc
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
   
    Well my Reflective MOF implementation is certainly still quite far 
from being able to provide a UML backend. I do have a Reflective 
repository running but it's perfectly useless without a specific MOF 
implementation for the meta-objects, so my next step is auto-generating 
that.

    I think that Chris' implementation must be much further along.

    In the past I've wondered about the possibility of making a UML 
plugin for kivio that could use the kUML backend, perhaps this could be 
the opportunity to do that ?  What is the timeframe for kdevelop 3.0 ?

    Gerard

           

>
               


>
>
>
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]