[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: Krita studio - feedback.
From:       Dmitry Kazakov <dimula73 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-10-21 16:13:28
Message-ID: CAEkBSfXMiC=Y6S=VkKb-_8tapqxYbpvYBR6AJ23_9-6f7tM+uQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Well, the reason why Krita doesn't use the Layer transparency for Transform
tool is that because it doesn't put the preview into the layer stack. It is
painted just over the top of the image. Yes, we could add a bit of
transparency, but still it will not be a real merged image.


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Simon Legrand <legrand.simon@gmail.com>wrote:

> Yes that's just for visualization, but I also agree with Ludovic that it
> is a little distracting when moving layers. I think ex-Gimp users would be
> used to it but in photoshop the layer will not change visible state when
> moving or transforming a layer. And when doing Matte-painting which
> requires a huge amount of cutting pasting and transforming of photographs,
> being able to see the result as use you transform or wrap a layer is a
> great advantage.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Boudewijn Rempt <boud@valdyas.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 15 October 2013 Oct 13:48:38 Ludovic Iochem wrote:
>> > On 15/10/13 12:38, Simon Legrand wrote:
>> > Hey guys,
>> > Yes, one more thing.
>> > When we transform a layer which has the opacity not at 100%, let say
>> > 30%, it goes back to 100% the time of the transform and goes back at 30%
>> > again after the move. That'd be better to keep the transparency as it is
>> > during the move.
>>
>>
>> That's only the visualization, right?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Boudewijn Rempt
>> http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org,
>> http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Krita mailing list
>> kimageshop@kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Simon Legrand
> http://slegrand.blogspot.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Krita mailing list
> kimageshop@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
>
>


-- 
Dmitry Kazakov

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">Well, the reason why Krita doesn&#39;t use the Layer \
transparency for Transform tool is that because it doesn&#39;t put the \
preview into the layer stack. It is painted just over the top of the image. \
Yes, we could add a bit of transparency, but still it will not be a real \
merged image.<br> </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Simon Legrand <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:legrand.simon@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">legrand.simon@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br> \
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Yes that&#39;s just for \
visualization, but I also agree with Ludovic that it is a little \
distracting when moving layers. I think ex-Gimp users would be used to it \
but in photoshop the layer will not change visible state when moving or \
transforming a layer. And when doing Matte-painting which requires a huge \
amount of cutting pasting and transforming of photographs, being able to \
see the result as use you transform or wrap a layer is a great advantage. \
<br>

</div><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div class="h5"><br><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Boudewijn Rempt <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:boud@valdyas.org" \
target="_blank">boud@valdyas.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On Tuesday 15 October 2013 Oct 13:48:38 \
Ludovic Iochem wrote:<br> &gt; On 15/10/13 12:38, Simon Legrand wrote:<br>
&gt; Hey guys,<br>
&gt; Yes, one more thing.<br>
&gt; When we transform a layer which has the opacity not at 100%, let \
say<br> &gt; 30%, it goes back to 100% the time of the transform and goes \
back at 30%<br> &gt; again after the move. That&#39;d be better to keep the \
transparency as it is<br> &gt; during the move.<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>That&#39;s only the visualization, right?<br>
<div><div><br>
<br>
--<br>
Boudewijn Rempt<br>
<a href="http://www.valdyas.org" \
target="_blank">http://www.valdyas.org</a>, <a href="http://www.krita.org" \
target="_blank">http://www.krita.org</a>, <a \
href="http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl" \
target="_blank">http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl</a><br>


<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Krita mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kimageshop@kde.org" \
target="_blank">kimageshop@kde.org</a><br> <a \
href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop</a><br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br></div></div><div \
class="im">-- <br>Simon Legrand<br><a href="http://slegrand.blogspot.com/" \
target="_blank">http://slegrand.blogspot.com/</a> </div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Krita mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kimageshop@kde.org">kimageshop@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop</a><br> \
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dmitry Kazakov </div>



_______________________________________________
Krita mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic