Well, the reason why Krita doesn't use the Layer transparency for Transform tool is that because it doesn't put the preview into the layer stack. It is painted just over the top of the image. Yes, we could add a bit of transparency, but still it will not be a real merged image.


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Simon Legrand <legrand.simon@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes that's just for visualization, but I also agree with Ludovic that it is a little distracting when moving layers. I think ex-Gimp users would be used to it but in photoshop the layer will not change visible state when moving or transforming a layer. And when doing Matte-painting which requires a huge amount of cutting pasting and transforming of photographs, being able to see the result as use you transform or wrap a layer is a great advantage.


On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Boudewijn Rempt <boud@valdyas.org> wrote:
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 Oct 13:48:38 Ludovic Iochem wrote:
> On 15/10/13 12:38, Simon Legrand wrote:
> Hey guys,
> Yes, one more thing.
> When we transform a layer which has the opacity not at 100%, let say
> 30%, it goes back to 100% the time of the transform and goes back at 30%
> again after the move. That'd be better to keep the transparency as it is
> during the move.


That's only the visualization, right?


--
Boudewijn Rempt
http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org, http://www.boudewijnrempt.nl

_______________________________________________
Krita mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop




_______________________________________________
Krita mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop




--
Dmitry Kazakov