[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-kimageshop
Subject:    Re: Move to graphicsmagick
From:       Cyrille Berger <cberger () cberger ! net>
Date:       2006-05-25 14:00:51
Message-ID: 200605251600.52006.cberger () cberger ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

> The only reason I haven't done so was because I thought graphicsmagick
> wasn't packaged by distributions. If it is, or if we have enough clout to
> get it packaged, I think we should do it like greased lightning.
From irc:
12:02 < isaac> 12:00 < Riddell> developers shouldn't not use something because 
it's not packaged, if a program needs it people will package it unless 
there's some obvious problem with it

and I got flame for telling that there might be a problem, anyway, we might, 
for the moment, keep the imagemagick and mark it as deprecated, and have the 
graphicsmagick be activated over imagemagick if it is available and have a 
configure message to warn the user that imagemagick is deprecated and won't 
be maintained in the future.
-- 
--- Cyrille Berger ---
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]