From kde-kimageshop Thu May 25 14:00:51 2006 From: Cyrille Berger Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:00:51 +0000 To: kde-kimageshop Subject: Re: Move to graphicsmagick Message-Id: <200605251600.52006.cberger () cberger ! net> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-kimageshop&m=114856571013674 > The only reason I haven't done so was because I thought graphicsmagick > wasn't packaged by distributions. If it is, or if we have enough clout to > get it packaged, I think we should do it like greased lightning. From irc: 12:02 < isaac> 12:00 < Riddell> developers shouldn't not use something because it's not packaged, if a program needs it people will package it unless there's some obvious problem with it and I got flame for telling that there might be a problem, anyway, we might, for the moment, keep the imagemagick and mark it as deprecated, and have the graphicsmagick be activated over imagemagick if it is available and have a configure message to warn the user that imagemagick is deprecated and won't be maintained in the future. -- --- Cyrille Berger --- _______________________________________________ kimageshop mailing list kimageshop@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop